alperen.muti
1 min read

Building Production AI Agents: Architecture Patterns

A demo agent and a production agent share a model and almost nothing else. The gap is architecture.

Start with tools, not prompts

The reliability of an agent is bounded by the quality of its tools. A tool should do one thing, validate its own inputs, and return structured output. If a tool can fail silently, the agent will hallucinate around the failure.

Treat every tool like a public API: typed inputs, typed outputs, explicit errors.

Keep the loop bounded

An autonomous loop without limits is an outage waiting to happen. In production:

  • Cap the number of steps per task.
  • Add a wall-clock and token budget per run.
  • Make every step idempotent so a retry cannot double-charge or double-send.

Guardrails are deterministic

The model decides; code enforces. Validate the model's proposed action against hard rules before executing it. Sending money, deleting data, or emailing a customer should pass through a deterministic gate the model cannot talk its way past.

Measure with evals

You cannot improve what you cannot score. Build a small eval set of real tasks with known-good outcomes and run it on every prompt or model change. This is the single highest-leverage habit in agent development.

Escalate to humans

The best production agents know their limits. When confidence is low or the action is irreversible, the agent should escalate to a human with full context rather than guess. Designed well, this makes the system feel more autonomous, not less — because it rarely gets things wrong.

Building something that needs this?

I work with teams as a fractional AI CTO on exactly these problems.

Start a conversation